<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Exercise of Vital Powers &#187; National</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vitalpowers.com/category/national/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vitalpowers.com</link>
	<description>Commentary on liberty, politics and economics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bush on McCain</title>
		<link>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2008/02/11/bush-on-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2008/02/11/bush-on-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitalpowers.com/blog/2008/02/11/bush-on-mccain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John McCain is a &#8220;true conservative,&#8221; President Bush says
How they hell would you know what a conservative is, Mr. President? 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>John McCain is a &#8220;true conservative,&#8221; President Bush <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8UNK92G0&#038;show_article=1">says</a></em></p>
<p>How they hell would you know what a conservative is, Mr. President? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2008/02/11/bush-on-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good News</title>
		<link>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/11/26/good-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/11/26/good-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitalpowers.com/blog/2007/11/26/good-news/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THe GOP&#8217;s chances of getting the majority back has just gone up:
Sen. Trent Lott of Mississippi, the Senates No. 2 Republican, plans to resign his seat before the end of the year, congressional and White House officials said Monday.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THe GOP&#8217;s chances of getting the majority back <a href="http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2007/11/lott-to-resign.html">has just gone up:</a><br />
<em>Sen. Trent Lott of Mississippi, the Senates No. 2 Republican, plans to resign his seat before the end of the year, congressional and White House officials said Monday.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/11/26/good-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Is Losing Grip On Core Business Vote &#8211; WSJ.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/10/25/gop-is-losing-grip-on-core-business-vote-wsjcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/10/25/gop-is-losing-grip-on-core-business-vote-wsjcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitalpowers.com/blog/2007/10/25/gop-is-losing-grip-on-core-business-vote-wsjcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More evidence of the failure of the Bush Administration: GOP Is Losing Grip On Core Business Vote
When Wall Street is donating to the Democrats you know the GOP has f&#8217;ed things up royally.
Some well-known business leaders have openly changed allegiances. Morgan Stanley Chairman and Chief Executive John Mack, formerly a big Bush backer, now supports [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More evidence of the failure of the Bush Administration: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119127620102645595.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">GOP Is Losing Grip On Core Business Vote</a></p>
<p>When Wall Street is donating to the Democrats you know the GOP has f&#8217;ed things up royally.</p>
<blockquote><p>Some well-known business leaders have openly changed allegiances. Morgan Stanley Chairman and Chief Executive John Mack, formerly a big Bush backer, now supports Democratic front-runner Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York. John Canning Jr., chairman and chief executive of Madison Dearborn Partners, a large private-equity firm, now donates to Democrats after a lifetime as a Republican. Recently, he told one Democratic Party leader: &#8220;The Republican Party left me&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Its not just a few people who have jumped ship, donations are down across the board:</p>
<blockquote><p>Federal campaign-finance reports document shifting support in some quarters of the business community. Hedge funds last year gave 77% of their contributions in congressional races to Democrats, up from 71% during the 2004 election, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan analyst of campaign finances. Last year the securities industry gave 45% of its money to Republicans, down from 58% in 1996, the center said.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/10/25/gop-is-losing-grip-on-core-business-vote-wsjcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt Gets it</title>
		<link>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/05/29/newt-gets-it-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/05/29/newt-gets-it-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Primary08]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitalpowers.com/blog/2007/05/29/newt-gets-it-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only way we&#8217;re gonna win in 2008 is to run against the big-government and incompetent record of George W. Bush. 

The only way to keep the White House in G.O.P. hands, Gingrich said, would be to nominate someone who, in essence, runs against Bush, in the style of Nicolas Sarkozy, the center-right cabinet minister [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way we&#8217;re gonna win in 2008 is to run against the big-government and incompetent record of George W. Bush. </p>
<blockquote><p>
The only way to keep the White House in G.O.P. hands, Gingrich said, would be to nominate someone who, in essence, runs against Bush, in the style of Nicolas Sarkozy, the center-right cabinet minister who just won the French Presidency by making his own President, Jacques Chirac, his virtual opponent. Sarkozy is a transforming figure in French politics, Gingrich said, and he suggested that the only Republican who shared Sarkozyâ€™s â€œtransformativeâ€ approach to governing was, at that moment, eating a bowl of oatmeal at the McLean Family Restaurant.</p>
<p>â€œWhatâ€™s fascinating about Sarkozy is that you have an incumbent cabinet member of a very unpopular twelve-year Presidency, who over the last three years became the clear advocate of fundamental change, running against an attractive womanâ€â€”the Socialist leader SÃ©golÃ¨ne Royalâ€”â€œwho is the head of the opposition,â€ Gingrich went on. â€œIn a country that wanted to say, â€˜Not them,â€™ he managed to switch the identity of the â€˜them.â€™ He said, â€˜Iâ€™m different from Chirac, and sheâ€™s not. If you want more of the same, you should vote for her.â€™ It was a Lincoln-quality strategic decision.â€ (<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/06/04/070604fa_fact_goldberg?printable=true">Letter from Washington: Party Unfaithful: Reporting &#038; Essays: The New Yorker</a>)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/05/29/newt-gets-it-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dondero declares for Texas 14th</title>
		<link>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/05/16/dondero-declares-for-texas-14th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/05/16/dondero-declares-for-texas-14th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 16:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitalpowers.com/blog/2007/05/16/dondero-declares-for-texas-14th/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roftl
I am this morning, declaring my candidacy for Congress in the GOP primaries against Ron Paul. If he does not resign his seat, and if another Republican candidate does not declare against him, I will run a balls-to-the-wall campaign for Congress in Texas CD 14.
I am the guy that got Ron Paul elected to Congress [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roftl</p>
<blockquote><p>I am this morning, declaring my candidacy for Congress in the GOP primaries against Ron Paul. If he does not resign his seat, and if another Republican candidate does not declare against him, I will run a balls-to-the-wall campaign for Congress in Texas CD 14.</p>
<p>I am the guy that got Ron Paul elected to Congress in 1996. I can and will defeat him in 2008.</p>
<p>Eric Dondero, Fmr. Senior Aide<br />
US Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX)<br />
1997-2003</p></blockquote>
<p>HT: <a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/120230.html">Reason Magazine: Blowback, Texas-Style</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/05/16/dondero-declares-for-texas-14th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regretting Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/04/04/regretting-bush/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/04/04/regretting-bush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitalpowers.com/blog/2007/04/04/regretting-bush/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will pretty much sums up my take on the Bush Administration. 
Good Will Hintonâ€™s Free Market Thoughts and Political Review Â» Blog Archive Â» Regretting Bush
I disagree that &#8220;â€œThose who would have us pull out of Iraq are unwittingly encouraging our enemiesâ€ is simply a slur&#8221;. I do believe that the timetable crowd emboldens the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will pretty much sums up my take on the Bush Administration. </p>
<p><a href="http://willhintonblog.themarkettraders.com/2007/04/04/regretting-bush/">Good Will Hintonâ€™s Free Market Thoughts and Political Review Â» Blog Archive Â» Regretting Bush</a></p>
<p>I disagree that &#8220;â€œThose who would have us pull out of Iraq are unwittingly encouraging our enemiesâ€ is simply a slur&#8221;. I do believe that the timetable crowd emboldens the enemy by making them think &#8220;we win if we can outlast them, and we can speed things up with lots of little attacks&#8221;. </p>
<p>Hindsight is 20/20 and I should have known then what I know now. When the stakes are who gets to divy up the spoils of a 1.4 Trillion dollar budget the opposition will stop at nothing to take down the governing party, national security, peace in the middle east, freedom for millions or Iraqis be damned. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/04/04/regretting-bush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A damn good question</title>
		<link>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/03/21/a-damn-good-question/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/03/21/a-damn-good-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Primary08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitalpowers.com/blog/2007/03/21/a-damn-good-question/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laziness? Hubris? No one who would be worth a damn wants the job? To become a credible candidate you have to suck at the teat of lobbyists, rent seekers and big government nannys? The fact that with a war going on, and liberal entitlement programs about to bankrupt the government, people care more about who fathered the slut's baby than who will be our next President?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over on Peach Pundit &#8220;landman&#8221; <a href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/03/20/pearsons-for-gilmore-shafer-unaffiliated/#comment-58863">asks:</a><br />
<em>&#8220;The pressing question in this Primary,as sad as it is to say is HOW DID WE GET OURSELVES IN A POSITION TO HAVE SUCH A WEAK OVERALL FIELD?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Laziness? Hubris? No one who would be worth a damn wants the job? To become a credible candidate you have to suck at the teat of lobbyists, rent seekers and big government nannys? The fact that with a war going on, and liberal entitlement programs about to bankrupt the government, people care more about who fathered the slut&#8217;s baby than who will be our next President?</p>
<p>Maybe its because our leaders make up bullshit issues like Global Warming, Gay Marriage or liquids on planes, rather than talking about real issues that can&#8217;t be reduced to a sound bite the average voter (or third grader) can understand. </p>
<p>Argh!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/03/21/a-damn-good-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The AJC gets it right once and awhile</title>
		<link>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/03/15/the-ajc-gets-it-right-once-and-awhile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/03/15/the-ajc-gets-it-right-once-and-awhile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitalpowers.com/blog/2007/03/15/the-ajc-gets-it-right-once-and-awhile/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bottom line, though, Keen said the Republican base doesnâ€™t want to see Democrats hold the White House and Congress. â€œWe canâ€™t let that happen,â€ Keen said. â€œConservatives want to win, too. The movement has matured. We want to retain one leg of the three-legged stool.â€(source: Political Insider)
Glad to see the AJC acknowledge what i&#8217;ve been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bottom line, though, Keen said the Republican base doesnâ€™t want <strong>to see Democrats hold the White House</strong> and Congress. â€œWe canâ€™t let that happen,â€ Keen said. â€œConservatives want to win, too. The movement has matured. We want to retain one leg of the three-legged stool.â€(source: <a href="http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/shared-blogs/ajc/politicalinsider/">Political Insider</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Glad to see the AJC acknowledge what i&#8217;ve been saying for awhile: George W. Bush has been one of the nations strongest Democratic Presidents. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/03/15/the-ajc-gets-it-right-once-and-awhile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A bit late Mr. President</title>
		<link>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/02/16/a-bit-late-mr-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/02/16/a-bit-late-mr-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitalpowers.com/blog/2007/02/16/a-bit-late-mr-president/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will say this, Mr. President: It would have been nice if you did this <b>before</b> we lost the majority in Congress. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/02/phoning_in_earmarks.php">The President has directed agencies not to accept earmarks from Congress unless they are encoded in statute.</a> I&#8217;m not sure what percentage of earmarks are just strong-armed in by Congress critters, (vs officially appropriated), but Sens DeMint and Colburn and Rep. Flake seem to think this is a good thing, so I&#8217;ll defer to their judgement.</p>
<p>I will say this, Mr. President: It would have been nice if you did this <b>before</b> we lost the majority in Congress. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/02/16/a-bit-late-mr-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A trillion f&#8211;king dollars</title>
		<link>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/02/07/a-trillion-f-king-dollars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/02/07/a-trillion-f-king-dollars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vitalpowers.com/blog/2007/02/07/a-trillion-f-king-dollars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[February 28, 2001: â€œIn his first address to Congress, Bush likened his $ 1.9 trillion budget to a family budget&#8230;â€
February 5, 2002: â€œPresident Bush yesterday proposed a $ 2.13 trillion budget for next year&#8230;â€
February 4, 2003: â€œPresident Bush announced a $ 2.23 trillion budget for fiscal 2004 yesterday&#8230;â€
February 3, 2004: â€œPresident Bush sent Congress a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>February 28, 2001: â€œIn his first address to Congress, Bush likened his <strong>$ 1.9 trillion budget</strong> to a family budget&#8230;â€</p>
<p>February 5, 2002: â€œPresident Bush yesterday proposed a <strong>$ 2.13 trillion budget</strong> for next year&#8230;â€</p>
<p>February 4, 2003: â€œPresident Bush announced a <strong>$ 2.23 trillion budget</strong> for fiscal 2004 yesterday&#8230;â€</p>
<p>February 3, 2004: â€œPresident Bush sent Congress a <strong>$2.4 trillion</strong> spending plan yesterday&#8230;â€</p>
<p>February 13, 2005: â€œPresident Bush sent Congress a <strong>$2.57 trillion</strong> budget&#8230;â€</p>
<p>February 5, 2006: â€œPresident Bush plans to propose a <strong>$2.7 trillion</strong> budget tomorrow&#8230;â€</p>
<p>Today: â€œPresident Bush took aim yesterday at domestic spending as part of a plan to balance the budget in five years without raising taxes while increasing funding for the Iraq war and permanently expanding the military. With the <strong>$2.9 trillion budget</strong> he submitted to Congress&#8230;â€</p>
<p><a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=M2QxMjc5Zjg5NGRlMzViODU4MWI0YmUyM2Q5OTI3NzA=">(source)</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Any comment I make about this would likely involve an unpleasant run-in with federal law enforcement. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vitalpowers.com/2007/02/07/a-trillion-f-king-dollars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
