Sat 27 Aug 2005
Writing in the WSJ, law prof Richard Epstein takes the jury to task in the Merck Vioxx civil trial. (The jury awarded the plaintiff’s widow $250 million in “pain and suffering” – Texas law caps that to $25 million.)
Commenting on the effect the verdict will have on other future drugs he said:
Your implicit verdict is to shut down the entire quest for new medical therapies. Your verdict says you think that the American public is really better off with just hot-water bottles and leftover aspirin tablets.
http://www.pointoflaw.com/columns/archives/001482.php
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
